Nothing happens afterwards, there is an exception in logĮRROR - Wątkiem wywołującym musi być STA, ponieważ wiele składników interfejsów użytkownika go wymaga. But the push dialog is empty, as in it doesn't show any branches. What you should be doing is pulling their changes, merging them (or rebasing your changes on top of them), and then pushing. It means that someone else has pushed before you.
#SOURCETREE FORCE PUSH HOW TO#
And after merging or committing the button shows how many things need to be pushed. SourceTree doesn't expose force push because it's almost always not what you want to do. Command sequence describe how to connect with remote repository, create a new feature branch, push changes into your branch and create merge request after. I say this, because although I've experienced the issue being discussed with SourceTree before, I've never actually experienced any problems wih BitBucket itself before).It is not possible to push if force push flag is activated SourceTree Push Dialog Empty Clayton Neff Using version 3.2.6 in Windows, starting this morning my push dialog is empty. (Also, AFAICT, the root of the problem is definitely SourceTree, and neither BitBucket itself nor anything else at Atlassian's side of things. SourceTree is very cautious with this as the force option is by default deactivated. For SourceTree, you can follow exactly the same steps, but you have to take into account that you still need force push this. Sharing this information, not to have a go at SourceTree, nor to complain, but simply because it might indicate a possible solution for others in the same situation as my own (in the sense that maybe that hadn't yet considered using Git bash to handle all their Git-related business). You can still use the same commands, but you will need to force push the commit using git push -force example-branch. Proposed approach: Option in Preferences to 'Allow force push'. Would be great to be able to use SourceTree as intended, but until such a time comes, I'll just continue using Git bash (which has thus far worked perfectly for me, without any major problems) to interact with BitBucket (plus any other Git-related services and platforms). 6,220 2 0 Sourcetree pushPassword Required sourcetree 3. This can look like an easy workaround when the git push command does not work, but it is rarely recommended it’s not the default behavior for a reason.
You can use the -force flag (or -f for short). This difference makes it significantly more difficult to destroy. If you have a look at Git’s official documentation, you will quickly notice that you can force this command. git push -force overwrites the remote branch, while git push -force-with-lease only overwrites the remote branch if your local copy is aware of all of the commits on the remote branch. To set this up, you can create a Custom Action in SourceTree: Tools -> Options -> Custom Actions Click Add Set Menu caption, e.g. I know it has been 3 years, but you can use git push origin HEAD -f to push your current branch to origin, so this will automatically push to your tracked remote branch or will create a new branch in the origin. Not really a true "solution" to the *root* of the problem being discussed, but in my case, since my previous reply to this discussion, I've long since just been going about all my Git-related business via Git bash, which has worked out perfectly for me. Gerrit Force Push Branch Tag Gerrit Push git push. git push -force would do the job, although git push -force-with-lease is a safer command. If you’re using Atlassian SourceTree with a git repository and you do a local commit but then realise the message was incorrect, you can amend it before you push it to remote.
0 kommentar(er)
